Clinical negligence & personal injury · England and Wales
Most dental experts are dentists first and report writers second. Dr Alexander Michael combines 24 years in general practice with a Master of Laws in Medical Law, so breach, causation and CPR 35 shape the report from the first page, not the last.
Enquiries answered the same business day. Availability confirmed before instruction.
Services
Every report is CPR 35 compliant, addressed to the Court, and structured around the issues in your letter of instruction, not around generic dental commentary.
Assessment of dental injury, treatment to date, current condition, future treatment needs, timescales, costs and functional impact. The evidence that underpins valuation and settlement.
Opinion on the standard of care, alleged breaches and what flowed from them clinically, separating negligent outcomes from recognised complications of properly performed treatment.
A focused preliminary review before you commit to full expert evidence: the key issues, the evidential gaps, and a frank view on whether the case merits proceeding.
Replies to Part 35 questions, conference input with counsel, and joint expert discussions and statements, delivered within the litigation timetable.
Full detail, including the range of case types covered: Services · Case types
Why instruct Dr Michael
Still in practice after 24 years. Opinions on records, consent, treatment planning and prognosis reflect how dentistry is actually delivered today, and survive scrutiny from opposing experts who are.
An LLM in Medical Law and a Diploma in Legal Medicine mean the report is built around breach, causation and the expert's duty to the Court, not clinical narrative retro-fitted to litigation.
Instructions accepted from claimant, defendant and as single joint expert. The opinion is the same whoever pays for it, which is precisely what makes it useful in negotiation and at trial.
Working with instructing parties
How to instruct
Brief details of the matter, the issues to be addressed, key deadlines and whether examination is likely to be required. A same-business-day response confirms interest and availability.
The letter of instruction, records, radiographs and any existing reports are reviewed to confirm suitability. A written fee estimate and delivery date follow before work begins.
A CPR 35-compliant report addressed to the Court, with continued availability for questions, conferences and joint expert work through to resolution.
Full guidance on instructing, including what to send: How to instruct
Enquiries
Send the key details and any deadline. Enquiries are answered the same business day, or within one working day. There is no charge for an initial view on suitability.